USPTO serial 74617988
DEDICATED CONTRACT LOGISTICS A DIVISION OF THE DAY & ROSS TRANSPORTATION GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANI, LALITHA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEDICATED CONTRACT LOGISTICS A DIVISION OF THE DAY & ROSS TRANSPORTATION GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hartland, New Brunswick EOJ 1NO, CA
Hartland, New Brunswick EOJ 1NO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey C. Katz
JEFFREY C KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | warehousing and storage of goods; information services relating to transportation services; transportation services, freight forwarding services and courier services by land, sea and air | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |