USPTO serial 74618265
SHRIMPTERINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHRIMPTERINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Province of Quebec, CA
Province of Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS625 SLATERS LN FOURTH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | seafood processed as a culinary base for use in the preparation of seafood dishes | ACTIVE | Feb 23, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2000 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |