Drawing for BAYWATCH

USPTO serial 74619387

BAYWATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAYWATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER M EICHLER

PETER M EICHLER TROOP MEISINGER STEUBER & PASICH LLP10940 WILSHIRE BLVD 8TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90024-3902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003aftershave lotion; bath gel; bath powder; body cream; body oil; body powder; bubble bath; skin cleansing lotion; cosmetic compacts containing make-up; skin cream; deodorants and antiperspirants; shaving balm; beauty masks; hair bleaching preparations; blusher; hair removing cream; night cream; facial scrubs; shower gel; hair lighteners; skin toners; shaving gel; nonmedicated lip balm; lip gloss; lipstick; massage oil; makeup; skin moisturizer; skin soapABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 1998EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 1998EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 9, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 1997EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 6, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 14, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 21, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 27, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 27, 1996DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 2, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 20, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance