USPTO serial 74622258
CREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY M. CLUNAN
AMY M CLUNAN STREIBICH AND SEALEBRYTON TWR STE 1011271 POPLAR AVEMEMPHIS, TN 38104-7265Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus for recording, transmitting and/or reproducing sounds and images such as phonograph records, pre-recorded tapes and compact discs | ABANDONED | Nov 19, 1970 |
| 041 | licensing, publishing, recording and promotion of musical compositions, musicians, books, authors, and other works of art and authors/creators in the entertainment field | ABANDONED | Nov 19, 1970 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1997 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Nov 1, 1996 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |