Drawing for LE MISTRAL JOSEPH PHELPS

USPTO serial 74623439

LE MISTRAL JOSEPH PHELPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUEHLING, EVERETT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE MISTRAL JOSEPH PHELPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ISRAEL NISSENBAUM

ISRAEL NISSENBAUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUPGRAHAM & JAMES LLP885 THIRD AVE 24TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022-4834

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033wineABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 28, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 7, 1996EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 10, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 11, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 28, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 17, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 1996UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance