USPTO serial 74624062
EMERGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 1997
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMERGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Emergent Management Consulting, Inc.
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Emergent Management Consulting, Inc.
HOUSTON, TX
Emergent Management Consulting, Inc.
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Emergent Management Consulting, Inc.
Emergent Management Consulting, Inc.
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Emergent Management Consulting, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALAN J HAUS
Emergent Management Consulting, Inc.404 Bryant StreetSan Francisco, CA 94107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business management consulting services | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Emergent Management Consulting, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EMERGENT SOFTWARE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Emergent Management Consulting, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Emergent Management Consulting, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named EMERGENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2004 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |