USPTO serial 74625338
EZ TORQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREENBAUM, CINDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EZ TORQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry E. Engel
BARRY E ENGEL VINSON & ELKINS LLP1001 FANNIN, 2300 FIRST CITY TWRHOUSTON, TX 77002-6760UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | torque tool handling system which safely controls the reactive force of power tools (typically torque wrenches) avoiding operator injury or fatigue | ABANDONED | Jan 15, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 30, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 30, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |