Drawing for STUDIO TOKYO

USPTO serial 74626555

STUDIO TOKYO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STUDIO TOKYO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GERALD K. KITANO

GERALD K KITANO3435 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1800LOS ANGELES, CA 90010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018backpacks; bags (all purpose athletic, all purpose sports, athletic, carry-on, duffle, gym, overnight, school, school book, shoulder, tote, travel, traveling), fanny packs, suitcasesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 1996PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
May 14, 1996PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 29, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 3, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 8, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance