USPTO serial 74626758
BAYWATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2388002Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2000
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BAYWATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BAYWATCH PRODUCTION COMPANY, THE
Los Angeles, CA
BAYWATCH PRODUCTION COMPANY, THE
Burbank, CA
BAYWATCH PRODUCTION COMPANY, THE
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan L. Heller, Jennifer B. Hodulik and Christina Liu
Susan L. Heller, Greenberg Traurig, LLP2450 Colorado Avenue, Suite 400ESanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Women's boots, women's bras and panties, men's boxer shorts and men's neckties | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAYWATCH PRODUCTION COMPANY, THE
- Other trademarks owned by BAYWATCH PRODUCTION COMPANY, THE
- Other trademarks owned by BAYWATCH PRODUCTION COMPANY, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BAYWATCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 28, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |