Drawing for ON DEMAND VALUATION

USPTO serial 74629035

ON DEMAND VALUATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECK, LORETTA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ON DEMAND VALUATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen L. Heuer

KAREN L HEUER NATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC11000 PRAIRIE LAKES DREDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs and instructional manuals sold therewith for providing daily accrual processing for the financial industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 3, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 3, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 19, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 20, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 7, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 27, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance