Drawing for EXPERIENCE MUSIC PROJECT

USPTO serial 74629313

EXPERIENCE MUSIC PROJECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUSSMAN, RONALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPERIENCE MUSIC PROJECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia L. Doll

CYNTHIA L DOLL FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN1111 THIRD AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028games, computer games, toys and playthings, namely computer game software and users' manuals sold therewith computer game cartridges and cassettes, video game cartridges and cassettes, electronic games, computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely discs, joysticks, computer game carrying cases, goggles for use in connection with computer games, board games, card games, puzzles, flying disks, kites, yo-yos, skateboards, rollerskates, toy action figures and accessories therefor, figurines made of plastic, building blocks, bathtub toys, dolls and accessories therefor, doll clothing, bean bag dolls, bendable figurines, inflatable vinyl figures, marbles, puppets, banks, toy vehicles, model craft kits of toy figurines, carrying cases for toys and dolls, crib toys, costumes, masks, sports equipment, athletic equipment, swimming aids, skis, golf clubs and baseball batsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 1999EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 1999EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 26, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 10, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 24, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 26, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 3, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 11, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance