USPTO serial 74630526
OPENEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 1999
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPENEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
KELOWNA, BC, CA
NORTH VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
SOFTCARE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE INC.
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
SOFTCARE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE INC.
BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tyler Droste
Tyler Droste Gutwein Law200 S. Meridian Street, Suite 420Indianapolis, IN 46225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [computer modem, computers for use in electronic communications;] computer operating software; computer software for generating electronic forms; computer software for generating electronic images, electronic data interchange, electronic imaging and electronic workflow | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 1996 |
| 037 | providing installation services in the field of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 1996 |
| 038 | electronic mail | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | computer educational training services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 1996 |
| 042 | providing consulting services in the field of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTCARE CONSULTING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTCARE CONSULTING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by QHR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTCARE EC SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTCARE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTCARE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OPENEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 11, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 31, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |