USPTO serial 74630890
BIO-COMFORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, DARREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIO-COMFORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARL E. STAUSS
KARL E STAUSS NEXTEC APPLICATIONS INC2611 COMMERCE WAYVISTA, CA 92083UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | fabric treatment services designed to improve fabric feel, durability, drape, washability, wrinkle resistance, water repellency or water absorbency, breathability, wind resistance, color fastness, stain resistance, flame resistance, decreased toxicity, strength, snag resistance, abrasion resistance, chemical resistance, UV protection, bio-compatibility, and anti-static and anti-pilling properties | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEXTEC APPLICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Fabric Coating Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Fabric Coating Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named BIO-COMFORT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |