USPTO serial 74631393
WINDKEEPER COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINDKEEPER COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin Komen
EDWIN KOMEN CLEARY & KOMEN600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SE STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | personal communications devices, namely, two way pagers and mobile computers enabling wireless data transmission, advanced voice messaging, answer-back paging and high capacity two-way data transmission for mobile computers; and cellular phones, cellular fax machines and mobile computers enabling cellular mobile services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | personal communications services, namely, wireless data transmission via two-way paging networks including advanced voice messaging, answer-back paging and high capacity two-way data transmission from mobile computers; and cellular mobile services via cellular phones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Windkeeper Communications
- Other trademarks owned by Windkeeper Communications
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named WINDKEEPER COMMUNICATIONS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |