USPTO serial 74631985
SPARTACOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2092435Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 1997
- Examiner
- LEIFMAN, ARI
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPARTACOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TUCSON, AZ
Courtaboeuf 91946, FR
Courtaboeuf 91946, FR
Courtaboeuf 91946, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN H. PLATT
JOHN H PLATT SNELL & WILMER LLPONE ARIZONA CTR400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer peripherals and computer software for use on personal computers, for transferring data between computers on local and wide area networks | EXPIRED | — |
| 038 | telecommunications gateway services, namely, facilitating communications between computers and global computer networks connected by common protocols using hardware devices with embedded software | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPARTACOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SpartaCom
- Other trademarks owned by SpartaCom
- Other trademarks owned by SpartaCom
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named SPARTACOM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 2, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |