USPTO serial 74632884
HA SUN JUNG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HA SUN JUNG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK LOUKIDES
MARK LOUKIDES HASUNJUNG GENERAL FOOD CO LTDLAW OFFICE OF LOUKIDES & ASSOCIATES9681 GARDEN GROVE BLVD #204GARDEN GROVE, CA 92844Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | anchovy; kim chi, namely cabbage pieces preserved in hot red pepper paste; cucumbers pickled in salt; salt-pickled fish and shrimp in salty fluid; thick soy bean paste mixed with red peppers; soy bean paste | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |