USPTO serial 74633028
SEAMCRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEAMCRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Owen J. Murray
OWEN J MURRAY MARSHALL, O'TOOLE, GERSTEIN, ET AL6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | business and industrial bags, namely nylon, and nylon and vinyl bags for merchandise packaging, airline bags, boot bags, cosmetic bags, duffel bags, drawstring bags, insulated bags, product bags, school bags, school book bags, shoe bags, shoulder bags, sports bags, ski bags, tool bags, tote bags, travel bags, battery cases, calculator cases, cassette cases, carrying cases, computer cases, diskette cases, EKG cases, fishing rod cases, flag cases, game cases, instrument cases, lightmeter cases, oximeter cases, projector cases, spear cases, tool cases, and tripod cases | ABANDONED | Aug 24, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |