Drawing for INVESTIGATIVE REPORTS

USPTO serial 74633550

INVESTIGATIVE REPORTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INVESTIGATIVE REPORTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded videotapes featuring news, news commentary, current events, human interest stories and topics of general interestABANDONED—
041educational and entertainment services, namely, cable television programmingABANDONEDSep 27, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 19, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 1997IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 15, 1997AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 25, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 29, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance