USPTO serial 74633710
LE CIRQUE DE PEKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LE CIRQUE DE PEKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Kelly
JOHN E KELLY KELLY, BAUERSFELD & LOWRY6320 CANOGA AVE STE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 93167UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, in the nature of producing and exhibiting live acrobatic performances | ABANDONED | Jan 10, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |