USPTO serial 74633855
SUPERFILTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2186136Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 1998
- Examiner
- LYKOS, ANGELA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERFILTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Superconductor Technologies, Inc.
Santa Barbara, CA
Superconductor Technologies, Inc.
Santa Barbara, CA
Superconductor Technologies, Inc.
Santa Barbara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
POLAPHAT VERAVANICH
DAVID B MURPHY O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP610 NEWPORT CTR DR 17TH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | filters, namely cryogenic electronic filters and cooled electronic filters formed from superconductive materials | EXPIRED | Aug 21, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Superconductor Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Superconductor Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Superconductor Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SUPERFILTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 16, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |