USPTO serial 74634999
SV2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SV2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Boisbriand, Province of Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BURTON S. EHRLICH
BURTON S EHRLICH BREZINA & EHRLICH47 W POLK ST STE 333CHICAGO, IL 60605-2092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | sun visors for light emitting diode (LED) displays used for electric billboards to improve the visibility thereof; light emitting diodes (LEDs); electronic billboards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |