USPTO serial 74638660
PALETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ATCHISON, ALAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PALETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William G. Lane
WILLIAM G LANE LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM G LN18400 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500IRVINE, CA 92715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | bath and kitchen plastic floor mats; bath and kitchen rubber floor mats; bath and kitchen straw and sisal floor mats; plastic/vinyl wall coverings | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |