Drawing for CARTO'S MAPS

USPTO serial 74641404

CARTO'S MAPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANKIN, NANCY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARTO'S MAPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marnie Wright Barnhorst

MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028board gamesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 1998PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN—
Jul 20, 1998PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 1997CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 1, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 18, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 25, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance