USPTO serial 74642108
ORAFTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 1996
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORAFTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
B 1150 Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Brussels, BE
Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
B 1150 Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Brussels, BE
Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
B 1150 Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Brussels, BE
Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ WESTERMAN HATTORI DANIELS & ADRIAN LLP1250 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | natural binding agents for use in the manufacture of foods, sugar and chicory based preparations used in the manufacture of foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 4, 1994 |
| 005 | dietary supplements, and dietetic foods for persons on medically restricted diets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 4, 1994 |
| 029 | edible processed seeds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 4, 1994 |
| 030 | sugar, candy, chicory coffee substitutes, natural sweeteners, natural food flavorings, coffee, tea, cocoa, processed breakfast cereals, bread, pastry, biscuits, ice cream, sorbets, molasses, maple syrup, sauces (except cranberry sauce, applesauce and salad dressings), malt extracts for food, tapioca, tapioca flour, vanilla, potato flour, herbs and spices, soya flour, yeast substances for food, starch substitutes for food, cinnamon, mayonnaise, corn flour, and corn flakes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 4, 1994 |
| 031 | unprocessed produce, namely sugar cane, sugar beets, vegetables, coconuts, nuts, corn, fresh fruits, alga, and chicory roots; animal feeds, bird feed, and fish food | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 4, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA, en neerlandais Tiense Suikerraffinaderij N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named ORAFTI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2019 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |