USPTO serial 74642622
SPORTSZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHILLIPS,ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPORTSZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JILL SARNOFF RIOLA ESQ
JILL SARNOFF RIOLA BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP200 S ORANGE AVEORLANDO, FL 32801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing access to interactive computer databases containing information related to sports, sporting events, outdoor activities and events, and sports, recreation and outdoor clothing and equipment; providing access to computer bulletin boards in the field of information related to sports, sporting events, outdoor activities and events, and sports, recreation, and outdoor clothing and equipment; providing access to on-line magazines concerning sports, sporting events, outdoor activities and events, and sports, recreation and outdoor clothing and equipment; providing access time to on-line multi-user interactive educational and entertainment programs and games; providing computer support services, namely, consultation in the use and operation of on-line computer programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |