Drawing for CIBRCASE

USPTO serial 74643553

CIBRCASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIBRCASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Brock

CHRISTOPHER M BROCK HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer software development and support services for manufacturing and service companies, namely development of customized application software and programming, loading, and updating softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 1, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 11, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 22, 1998CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 3, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 15, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 28, 1996CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 24, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 1996SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 22, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 20, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 2, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance