USPTO serial 74643689
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dorval, Quebec, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic systems, namely, microprocessor based fire detection and control instrument panel for fire monitoring purposes including surveillance of door switches and door control devices; fire display instrument control panels; remote display control panels; fire sensors, namely, smoke detectors, heat detectors, flame detectors, early warning smoke detection system comprising highly sensitive smoke detectors coupled with an air sampling apparatus; fireman's telephones; fire extinguishers; solenoid valves; solenoid actuators; automatic valves; automatic control valves; water pressure regulators; water pressure gauges; water level gauges; microprocessor controller of fire extinguishing releasing materials, namely, water, carbon dioxide, halon and similar gases which can extinguish fires | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | fire extinguising sprinkler deluge systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | engineering services in the fields of fire protection, detection and suppression systems | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |