Drawing for FREQUENT VIEWER

USPTO serial 74644736

FREQUENT VIEWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREQUENT VIEWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J GEORG SEKA

J GEORG SEKA TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001photo-sensitive foils or photo-sensitive paper laminated to at least one layer of paper or cardACTIVE—
016paper for postcards, envelopes and holders made of paper for photo-sensitive material and for diskette covers; newspapers, journals and magazines in the fields of teaching, education and entertainment; and manuals for computer programs in the fields of teaching, education and entertainmentACTIVE—
039transportation of passengers and goods by air, ferry, boat, rail and busACTIVE—
041production and distribution of films and television shows about sporting and cultural activities, teaching and educationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 16, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 10, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 24, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 15, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 21, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 28, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 1997REINREINSTATED—
Nov 6, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance