USPTO serial 74646003
FERRO-TECH-DISC-PELLETIZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 1997
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, JEFFERY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FERRO-TECH-DISC-PELLETIZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori S. Rardon, Esq.
Lori S. Rardon, Esq. REED SMITH LLPP. O. BOX 488PITTSBURGH, PA 15230-0488UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine which utilizes turbulated disc action for purpose of producing pellets from fine powder, such pellets of general uniform size | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED PROCESSES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ferro-Tech, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ferro-Tech, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ferro-Tech, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named FERRO-TECH-DISC-PELLETIZER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 9, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 8, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 2, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |