USPTO serial 74647755
MCLUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 1997
- Examiner
- RICARDO, RANDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MCLUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L. White
Adrienne L. White WRB-IP LLPPO BOX 476Wadsworth, OH 44282UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | mold release compounds for use in the rubber and plastics industries to facilitate removal of molded parts from molds and release of rubber hose from mandrels; antistick, antitack, antiblocking agents for use in the rubber industry to prevent uncured rubber from sticking to itself | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 1987 |
| 004 | powdered lubricants of molybdenum disulfide for use on surfaces by rubbing, tumbling or dusting and inclusion for purposes of lubricity in plastic parts, namely, gears; dry lubricants containing molybdenum disulfide and/or polytetrafluoroethylene dispersed in solvent or water for use to deposit dry lubricant coatings on all sliding surfaces, namely, mechanical parts, threaded connectors, conveyors o-rings, sleeves, bearings, spline drives, for use in metal forming, for use to prevent seizing, galling, scoring and to protect against extreme pressures; lubricant pastes containing molybdenum disulfide in high concentrations dispersed in oils for use as antiseizing lubricants for threaded connections, press fittings and sliding surfaces, in extreme pressure applications, in high temperature applications, namely, conveyor chains in heat treat ovens; greases containing molybdenum disulfide for use as lubricants for bearing, antiseize compounds for threaded connections, press fittings, studs, sliding surfaces, open gears, in extreme pressure applications, as lubricants for parts in heat treating ovens | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by McGEE INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by McGEE INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by McGEE INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named MCLUBE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2020 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |