USPTO serial 74649751
TELE-TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITCHY, MICHELLE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TELE-TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Reston, VA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Reston, VA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maribeth R. Evans
MARIBETH R EVANS PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP130 KEARNY ST ROOM 3659SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | electronic games and equipment, namely multimedia games; virtual reality games; interactive media games; computer games and computer game programs; video games; and electronic game equipment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-TV
- Other trademarks owned by BNP PARTNERS, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-TV
- Other trademarks owned by BNP PARTNERS, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named TELE-TV
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |