USPTO serial 74649752
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Reston, VA
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Reston, VA
Los Angeles, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Reston, VA
Reston, VA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Reston, VA
Reston, VA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial services, namely, financial information provided by electronic means; banking information services provided by electronic means | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |