USPTO serial 74649769
TELE-TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TELE-TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RESTON, VA
RESTON, VA
Los Angeles, CA
RESTON, VA
Los Angeles, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
RESTON, VA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | construction services, namely, installing and maintaining telecommunications and interactive multimedia systems and equipment for others; installation and repair of cable television wiring; and providing commercial and industrial real estate development services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-TV
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-TV
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-TV MEDIA, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-TV
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-TV MEDIA, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by BNP PARTNERS, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE-TV
- Other trademarks owned by BNP PARTNERS, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named TELE-TV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |