USPTO serial 74649805
MEMPHIS MADDOGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEMPHIS MADDOGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sara A. Benin
SARA A BENIN GLANKLER BROWN PLLC1700 ONE COMMERCE SQMEMPHIS, TN 38103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's, women's and children's clothing, namely T-shirts, caps, hats, fleece tops and bottoms, polo shirts, knit shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, shorts, tank tops, sweaters, pants, jackets, turtlenecks, jerseys, warm up suits, swimwear, wind resistant jackets, parkas, sleepwear, gloves, scarves, boots and sneakers, replica foot ball jersey, replica football pants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |