USPTO serial 74651271
HITMEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 19, 2002
- Examiner
- JENNINGS, PATRICK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with HITMEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Dean
Jennifer L. Dean FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K Street, NWSuite 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | [headbands, sweatbands, caps, ] [wind resistant jackets,] [ ; ] uniform jerseys [and h] | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | [ a ;] providing intertactive electronic online information in the fields of hockey [, physical fitness and exercise] [; and ]television programs on the subjects of hockey, physical fitness, exercise, [nutrition ] and health | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 1056648 Ontario Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HART, BRET
- Other trademarks owned by 1056648 Ontario Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 1056648 Ontario Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named HITMEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 7, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |