Drawing for HI-LITE SPECIAL MILD

USPTO serial 74651510

HI-LITE SPECIAL MILD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZERVAS, ALBERT JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI-LITE SPECIAL MILD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RAYMOND C STEWART

RAYMOND C STEWART BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034tobacco, cigars, chewing tobacco, cigarettes, cigarette tips, ashtrays (not of precious metal), cigarette cases (not of precious metal), cigarette holders (not of precious metal), lighters for smokers (not of precious metal), tobacco pouches, and matchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 1999EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 1998EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 22, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 20, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 1, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 11, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance