Drawing for THE OUTLAW BURGER

USPTO serial 74651566

THE OUTLAW BURGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWE, ROBERT J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE OUTLAW BURGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Babette D. Kamm

BABETTE D KAMM FOODMAKER, INC9330 BALBOA AVESAN DIEGO, CA 92123-1516UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030hamburger sandwichesABANDONEDSep 19, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 1997PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Sep 26, 1996PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 17, 1996PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 13, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 1996UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance