Drawing for PETLAND

USPTO serial 74651827

PETLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TUCCILLO, SUSANA M.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PETLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph A. Kolasch

JOSEPH A KOLASCH BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCHP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005foodstuffs for animals, namely, feed supplements for petsABANDONED—
018requisites for cats, namely, collars and leadsABANDONED—
020requisites for cats, namely, playthings in the nature of playhouses and carrying containers in the nature of portable bedsABANDONED—
021requisites for cats, namely, feeding bowls, brushes, combs, carrying containers in the nature of cages, and toilets in the nature of litter boxesABANDONED—
028requisites for cats, namely, playthings in the nature of toysABANDONED—
031litter material for petsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 30, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 1997EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 7, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 7, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 24, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 23, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 7, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 18, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance