USPTO serial 74653595
THINK OUT OF THE BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THINK OUT OF THE BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott M. Oldham
SCOTT M OLDHAM TWIN OAKS ESTATEOLDHAM, OLDHAM & WILSON CO LPA1225 W MARKET STAKRON, OH 44313Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | series of books, instructional workbooks and related printed educational materials regarding enhancing creative thinking | ABANDONED | May 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1996 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |