USPTO serial 74655695
IWORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IWORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON SPENCER & FRANKSTE 300 E1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing multiple user access to a global on-line service for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of services and information | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |