USPTO serial 74656815
B BEACON EYE INSTITUTE & B LASER CENTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B BEACON EYE INSTITUTE & B LASER CENTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol Anne Been
CAROL ANNE BEEN SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL233 S WACKER DR8000 SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | operating, managing and providing for others facilities at which photorefractive keratectomy and other procedures to treat vision disorders are performed | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | developing and disseminating educational programs for others, and providing training in the form of seminars in the field of performing photorefractive keratectomy and other procedures to treat vision disorders | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | performing photorefractive keratectomy and other procedures to treat myopia, astigmatisms and other vision disorders, and quality control for others in the field of performing photorefractive keratectomy and other procedures to treat vision disorders | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BEI Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BEI Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Beacon Eye Institute, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named B BEACON EYE INSTITUTE & B LASER CENTERS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |