USPTO serial 74657123
NUTRA RECIPES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUTRA RECIPES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-3007 Berne, CH
CH-3007 Berne, CH
CH-3007 Berne, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jackie Stelling
Jackie Stelling Nestle Nutrition/Gerber Products Company12 Vreeland Road, 2nd Floor, Box 697Florham Park, NJ 07932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | grain and/or flour based ready-to-eat nutritional food bars; confectionery, namely bakery products | ABANDONED | Jun 5, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SANDOZ NUTRITION LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SANDOZ NUTRITION LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SANDOZ NUTRITION LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NUTRA RECIPES
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |