Drawing for NUTRA RECIPES

USPTO serial 74657123

NUTRA RECIPES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
Law office
PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NUTRA RECIPES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030grain and/or flour based ready-to-eat nutritional food bars; confectionery, namely bakery productsABANDONEDJun 5, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 19, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Nov 29, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 29, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Nov 19, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 6, 1997CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY
Jul 22, 1997OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jul 22, 1997OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 10, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 28, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jul 30, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 29, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 18, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 6, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 1995IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Nov 28, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 18, 1995AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 15, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 15, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance