USPTO serial 74657615
BREVET TX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREVET TX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brevet Hospital Products (U.K.) Limited
Oldham, Lancashire OL1 3HS, GB
Other trademarks owned by Brevet Hospital Products (U.K.) Limited
Brevet Hospital Products (U.K.) Limited
Oldham, Lancashire OL1 3HS, GB
Other trademarks owned by Brevet Hospital Products (U.K.) Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Cronk
PETER J CRONK DUANE, MORRIS & HECKSCHERONE LIBERTY PLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7396UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | orthopedic articles, namely suture materials; incontinence sheets; catheters, stockinettes and compression stockings; anti-embolism stockings; tray wraps; orthopedic draping materials, such as sheets, used during orthopedic operations; and all related parts and fittings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brevet Hospital Products (U.K.) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Brevet Hospital Products (U.K.) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named BREVET TX
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |