USPTO serial 74657637
PALOMINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PALOMINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine E. Maxson
Catherine E. Maxson Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | prepared alcoholic cocktails excluding wine | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUI ONE CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Restaurants Unlimited, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Restaurants Unlimited, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named PALOMINO
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 9, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |