USPTO serial 74658746
AUTO PARTS CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CHAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTO PARTS CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRI J.A. CHARMASSON
HENRI J A CHARMASSON1545 HOTEL CIR S STE 150SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-3413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | discount wholesale and retail store services in the field of automotive parts | ABANDONED | Oct 28, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |