USPTO serial 74658786
DEFLECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEFLECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Town of Mount Royal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK S SOMMERS
MARK S SOMMERS FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | accessories for the practice of street, fitness, and recreational in-line skating, namely athletic bags, fanny packs and sports bags specifically designed for carrying in-line skates and in-line skating body protective equipment | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | in-line skating equipment and accessories, namely, in-line roller skates and replacement parts therefor; body protecting equipment for the practice of in-line skating, namely, elbow pads, arm pads, hip pads, knee pads, ankle pads, wrist guards, guard gloves for hands, neck guards, and girdles comprising body protective padding or guards or both for in-line skating; shin guards, leg guards and ankle guards | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |