USPTO serial 74658965
TIC-TAC TWICE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIC-TAC TWICE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN G POSA
JOHN G POSA GIFFORD KRASS GROH SPRINKLE280 N WOODWARD AVE STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | electronic games, computer games and the software therefore | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1997 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 6, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |