USPTO serial 74659423
JOLLIBEE GREAT BURGERS GREAT CHICKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOLLIBEE GREAT BURGERS GREAT CHICKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pasig, Metro Manila, PH
Pasig, Metro Manila, PH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen and prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; eggs; chili; non-dairy cream; cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; milk; cheese; butter; yogurt; edible oils and fats; and preserved pickles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | self-service and fast-food restaurant services, catering services, cafeteria services, and cafe services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jollibee Foods Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Jollibee Foods Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named JOLLIBEE GREAT BURGERS GREAT CHICKEN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 6, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |