USPTO serial 74660166
TUTORNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TUCCILLO, SUSANA M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TUTORNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | education services, namely seminars, workshops, classes of instruction in basic education (reading, english, arithmetic, mathematics, etc); academic fields including but not limited to engineering, mathematics, other physical sciences, business management/theory, targeted one on one instruction in the above mentioned dields as well as any other requested academic discipline found in standard primary, secondary and post-secondary curricula; training in the use of computers and all associated peripheral devices as well as any other equipment and its use and /or operation related to the above | ABANDONED | Jun 26, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |