USPTO serial 74660320
PERFECT CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 1997
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFECT CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Billy A. Robbins
BILLY A ROBBINS ROBBINS, BERLINER & CARSON201 N FIGUEROA ST FIFTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90012-2628UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin lotion, skin creams, sun block, sun tan lotions, mouth wash, pre moistened cosmetic wipes, nail polish, nail polish remover, personal deodorant, hair shampoo, cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes, puffs for cosmetic purposes, shaving cream, after shaving lotion, denture cleaners, sold only in retail supermarket stores | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 1991 |
| 005 | douches, sanitary napkins, eye drops, pain relief medication, laxatives, anti diarrhea medicine, antacids, adhesive bandages, medicated lip balm, cold medications, nasal spray preparations, sinus and allergy medications, decongestants, cough drops, expectorants, and rubbing alcohol sold in retail supermarket stores | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 1991 |
| 008 | razor blades | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1991 |
| 021 | cotton balls | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named PERFECT CHOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2004 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |